Skip to content
A company which rates people’s online behaviour says it is planning “world domination”.It is a joke that sounds like hubris, and there is indeed plenty of that to be seen. The data hunger such a goal demands is the main reason, they argue, why Google is entering markets as diverse as self-driving cars, smart homes, robotics and health care.
Try full digital access and see why over 1 million readers subscribe to the FTFT print edition delivered Monday - Saturday along with ePaper accessPremium FT.com access for multiple users, with integrations & admin toolsPurchase a Trial subscription for 1,00 € for 4 weeks You will be billed 60,50 € per month after the trial endsPurchase a Digital subscription for 6,50 € per week You will be billed 37,50 € per month after the trial endsPurchase a Print subscription for 14,30 € per week You will be billed 61,95 € per month after the trial endsPurchase a Team or Enterprise subscription for per week
Everybody Wants to Rule the World is a series of Play-by-Post Games created by a user named Spider Kaiju late in 2018.
Thus Google may dominate the world of search and the associated sale of advertisements, but it gets no direct revenue from the first and in the second it competes with a range of other people in the larger overall market for online advertising (see chart 2).The second argument is that network effects and advantages of scale do not in themselves amount to barriers to entry. In the 1911 decision which cut Standard Oil into 34 different companies, America’s Supreme Court held that the fate of a dominant company should depend on whether it abused its dominance to the detriment of consumers. “We will own this space,” predicts the founder of a company that helps shops send digital offers to nearby phones. Internet monopolies Everybody wants to rule the world. Since the firm went public in 2004 it has regularly beaten market expectations, with average annual revenue growth of more than 30%. Both speak to alarm at the sheer size of the companies concerned.Something about the internet clearly favours such mushrooming quasi-monopolies. That said, even if there is no need to show profits, there is clearly a call for money made in the established bits of the business to fund growth in the newer parts. We can either hide from the adventure or embrace it.Tears for Fears is an English band that became popular in the 1980s with one of their big songs being “Everybody Wants to Rule the World.” [below] Time moves on and we have to follow suit.Life is happening all around us and we have two choices. Network effects bring it ever more data; continued success and smart strategy ensure it keeps its edge in brain power. Online businesses can grow very large very fast—it is what makes them exciting. Facebook may benefit from strong network effects, but many users “multi-home”, meaning that they are also members of other online clubs, such as Pinterest and Twitter. It has offered more and more information directly on its search pages, often doing away with the need to visit other sites.These proclivities may have led to interest from the FTC and the European Commission, but they have not given Google a “browser moment”—so-called in memory of Microsoft’s decision to bundle Internet Explorer, its web browser, with its Windows operating system in an attempt to kill off Netscape, which was enjoying huge success in the browser market. The song was first released on 18 March 1985 by Phonogram, Mercury, and Vertigo Records as the third single from the band's second album, Songs from the Big Chair (1985). When the company launched in 2010 in San Francisco it offered only the services of drivers with full-sized luxury cars in and around San Francisco. “Google is trying to leverage the advantage it has in one area into many others,” says Nathan Newman, a lawyer and technology activist. If your idea for a service or product can be scaled up to cover the world, why would you not plan to do just that? And in the world of indirect effects, helping the user is not all that has to be done to play fair.The FTC decided not to go after Google in 2013 because the company offered assurances that it would change some practices, such as letting advertisers get at their data. And the really big ones can afford to build global networks of data centres and dedicated fibre-optic cables, just like the incumbents have, in order to do battle. Peter Thiel, one of the founders of PayPal (now the market leader in online and mobile payments), and an early investor in Facebook, argues that monopolies add “entirely new categories of abundance to the world”.
Though Microsoft has been able to build, in Bing, a broadly Google-equivalent search engine, it has not managed to make it a profitable business, despite billions of dollars spent trying.This is not just because of Google’s data advantage. The rise of mobile computing, driven by Apple, killed off Microsoft’s regulator-attracting desktop dominance. This may already be happening. There the benefit was direct: the addition of new members helped all members.
This seemed, at that time, to be the case for Standard Oil.
Become A Better Singer In Only 30 Days, With Easy Video Lessons! Since then Google has offered changes in some of its practices, such as giving less prominence to its own offerings in advertising next to search results.This is the sort of thing that gives people like Mr Thiel conniptions. But intuitive views of the direction of internet competition have been wrong before, as the existence of giants like Google, Amazon and Facebook bears witness. Not only is that unfair to our friends, family, and people we live with but it is also a ludicrous motion.I have no say over whether or not Tuesday morning starts. If he is right, then treating monopolies in the digital realm just like their bricks-and-mortar—or oil-well-and-pipeline—predecessors would be very bad for innovation and growth.In America, and in most of the rest of the world, private monopolies are treated with deep distrust. And the profits monopolies can bring allow bold long-term plans and ambitious research projects that “firms locked in competition can’t dream of”. There are plenty of firms both large and small trying to take on Google in any number of ways. Google, for instance, has a huge advantage in knowing what people want to buy, and thus a dominant position when it comes to auctioning off these leads to would-be sellers.